Headlines
  • Economies of Scale vs. Economies of Scope

Accounting for Intangible Assets

08 Mar 2012 / 0 Comments

Steve Collings looks at the fundamental principles in accounting for goodwill and intangible assets and also looks at some fundamental differences between current UK GAAP, IFRS and the proposed IFRS for SMEs.As accountants we are all aware that an intangible asset does not have any physical form

Read More...

Financial Accounting
Economics

Economies of Scale vs. Economies of Scope

Generally speaking, economies of scale is about the benefits gained by the production of large volume of a p...

Currency Appreciation and Depreciation

Current and Financial Account Surpluses and Deficits Current account deficits (or surpluses) and financi...

Communication Skills

A Sample Cover Letter For A Job Application

Most jobs ask for a cover letter along with your resume. A cover letter can make or break your case with th...

Communication

  VERBAL COMMUNICATIONThe term “Verbal” implies ‘use of words’ which makes language. Verbal communicati...

Information Technology

    Lesson 4: Creating Charts

    In Microsoft Excel, you can represent numbers in a chart. On the Insert tab, you can choose from a variety o...

Laws

INDEMNITY and GURANTEE

Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 ...

Management and Marketing

Interest rate risk management

The management of risk is a key area within a number of ACCA papers, and exam questions related to this area ...

Regional and Sustainable Development Department

RSCG is the Capacity Development and Governance Division of the, Regional and Sustainable Development Departm...

Comparison of financial and management accounting

There are two broad types of accounting information: • Financial Accounts: geared toward external users of...

Financial Management
Mathimetics

Linear Equation with Video Examples

An equation is a mathematical statement that has an expression on the left side of the equals sign (=) wi...

Cost Accounting

Product vs Period Costs

Product Costs: Include all costs that are required to make a product Product costs are: Direct Material...

Statistics
Audit and Assurance
Economics
Published On:Friday, 23 December 2011
Posted by Muhammad Atif Saeed

Net Preset Value

NPV and IRR are two methods for making capital-budget decisions, or choosing between alternate projects and investments when the goal is to increase the value of the enterprise and maximize shareholder wealth. Defining the NPV method is simple: the present value of cash inflows minus the present value of cash outflows, which arrives at a dollar amount that is the net benefit to the organization.

To compute NPV and apply the NPV rule, the authors of the reference textbook define a five-step process to be used in solving problems:

1.Identify all cash inflows and cash outflows.2.Determine an appropriate discount rate (r). 3.Use the discount rate to find the present value of all cash inflows and outflows. 4.Add together all present values. (From the section on cash flow additivity, we know that this action is appropriate since the cash flows have been indexed to t = 0.)5.Make a decision on the project or investment using the NPV rule: Say yes to a project if the NPV is positive; say no if NPV is negative. As a tool for choosing among alternates, the NPV rule would prefer the investment with the higher positive NPV.

Companies often use the weighted average cost of capital, or WACC, as the appropriate discount rate for capital projects. The WACC is a function of a firm's capital structure (common and preferred stock and long-term debt) and the required rates of return for these securities. CFA exam problems will either give the discount rate, or they may give a WACC.

Example:To illustrate, assume we are asked to use the NPV approach to choose between two projects, and our company's weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is 8%. Project A costs $7 million in upfront costs, and will generate $3 million in annual income starting three years from now and continuing for a five-year period (i.e. years 3 to 7). Project B costs $2.5 million upfront and $2 million in each of the next three years (years 1 to 3). It generates no annual income but will be sold six years from now for a sales price of $16 million.

For each project, find NPV = (PV inflows) - (PV outflows).

Project A: The present value of the outflows is equal to the current cost of $7 million. The inflows can be viewed as an annuity with the first payment in three years, or an ordinary annuity at t = 2 since ordinary annuities always start the first cash flow one period away.

PV annuity factor for r = .08, N = 5: (1 - (1/(1 + r)N)/r = (1 - (1/(1.08)5)/.08 = (1 - (1/(1.469328)/.08 = (1 - (1/(1.469328)/.08 = (0.319417)/.08 = 3.99271

Multiplying by the annuity payment of $3 million, the value of the inflows at t = 2 is ($3 million)*(3.99271) = $11.978 million.

Discounting back two periods, PV inflows = ($11.978)/(1.08)2 = $10.269 million.

NPV (Project A) = ($10.269 million) - ($7 million) = $3.269 million.

Project B: The inflow is the present value of a lump sum, the sales price in six years discounted to the present: $16 million/(1.08)6 = $10.083 million.

Cash outflow is the sum of the upfront cost and the discounted costs from years 1 to 3. We first solve for the costs in years 1 to 3, which fit the definition of an annuity.

PV annuity factor for r = .08, N = 3: (1 - (1/(1.08)3)/.08 = (1 - (1/(1.259712)/.08 = (0.206168)/.08 = 2.577097. PV of the annuity = ($2 million)*(2.577097) = $5.154 million.

PV of outflows = ($2.5 million) + ($5.154 million) = $7.654 million.

NPV of Project B = ($10.083 million) - ($7.654 million) = $2.429 million.
         Applying the NPV rule, we choose Project A, which has the larger NPV: $3.269 million versus $2.429 million.

Exam Tips and Tricks

Problems on the CFA exam are frequently set up so that it is tempting to pick a choice that seems intuitively better (i.e. by people who are guessing), but this is wrong by NPV rules. In the case we used, Project B had lower costs upfront ($2.5 million versus $7 million) with a payoff of $16 million, which is more than the combined $15 million payoff of Project A. Don't rely on what feels better; use the process to make the decision!


About the Author

Posted by Muhammad Atif Saeed on 19:28. Filed under , . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Feel free to leave a response

By Muhammad Atif Saeed on 19:28. Filed under , . Follow any responses to the RSS 2.0. Leave a response

0 comments for "Net Preset Value"

Leave a reply

Visit Counters

About Me

My photo
I am doing ACMA from Institute of Cost and Management Accountants Pakistan (Islamabad). Computer and Accounting are my favorite subjects contact Information: +923347787272 atifsaeedicmap@gmail.com atifsaeed_icmap@hotmail.com
  1. Accounting for Intangible Assets
  2. Fair Value Measurement of Financial Liabilities
  3. The Concept of Going Concern
  4. The Capital Asset Pricing Model
  5. Bond Valuation
  6. Asset Management Market Efficiency Asset Management Market Efficiency
x

Welcome to eStudy.Pk....Get Our Latest Posts Via Email - It's Free

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner